|
London North Western
Railway:
Midland
Railway:
Stratford
Midland Junction Railway
|
|
Tamworth High Level Station
Introduction
Tamworth was a small market town and was historically split
between Staffordshire and Warwickshire, with the county boundary running
through the town centre although the station was within Warwickshire. Following
the county boundary changes in 1887, the station lay just outside Warwickshire
with the approaches to the station being within Warwickshire. Tamworth's
original stations were provided first by the Birmingham & Derby Junction
Railway (B&DJR) in 1839 - absorbed in to the Midland Railway (MR) in 1844 -
and then shortly afterwards by the Trent Valley Railway (TVR), which was taken
over by the London & North Western Railway (L&NWR) before it opened in
1847. The Midland Railway station was situated on the Birmingham to Derby line
whilst the London & North Western Railway station was later constructed at
right angles to the Midland Railway line and immediately beneath it. Their
strategic relationship to each other can be ascertained by the construction of
a connecting line joining between the two in June 1847 whereas the Trent Valley
Railway's station was opened three months later in September 1847. Tamworth's
importance lay in the development of the Royal Mail services which with the
Penny Post saw an immense expansion in this important service. In addition to
this connecting line, which ran between the London & North Western
Railway's up line to Nuneaton and the Midland Railway's up line to Derby (see
the aerial photograph of the two stations), there
was an abandoned formation of another connecting line which left the Midland
Railway's down line to Whitacre just to the north of Tamworth High Level
station and joined the London & North Western Railway's up line to Nuneaton
to the south of Tamworth Low Level station (see image 'mrthl1808'). With its convenient interchange between
the Midland and LNWR services, Tamworth secured a passenger service which was
far better than might otherwise have been the case. On the Midland division,
the LMS provided some 18 trains each way including a number of expresses.
N.B. For clarity when describing the two stations we have adopted from the
outset the LMS' description of Low Level for the Trent Valley Railway/LNWR
station and High Level for the B&DJR/Midland Railway station. These
descriptions were first used in 1924 and coincided with the MR removing its two
signal boxes to the north and south of the station with one located on the
platform and named Tamworth High Level Signal Box.
Layout and Operation
The two stations were located to the North-East of the
market town with road vehicle access being provided at a junction between
Victoria Road and Albert Road. Prior to the erection of the Livock designed
building, the Midland Railway had a rising gradient approach to its station
located on the up (Derby) platform. The Midland Railway's 'High Level' station
had two platforms with just two running lines between the platform faces. It
would appear that in the first few years prior to the 'Low Level' station being
built, B&DJR passengers to access the down (Birmingham) platform they would
have had to pass beneath the railway using Bridge 68. The goods shed and yard
with sidings was located adjacent to the top of Victoria Road, opposite the
junction with Albert Road and was at a much lower level than the running lines.
The up platform was significantly shorter than the down platform being equipped
with a vehicle dock and wagon turntables at its southern most end. To serve the
dock there were two sidings, one running parallel with the dock which had a
semi-circular cut out in its face to accommodate one of the wagon turntables.
The other siding ran parallel with is siding and it to had a wagon turntable,
located adjacent to the other wagon turntable, a configuration allowing railway
vehicles to be released from the dock. This second siding also provided access
to the goods yard by running beyond the dock, on a falling gradient, for a
considerable distance leading to a headshunt whereby a train would then be
reversed on to another siding with a falling gradient leading to the Midland
Railway's goods yard and sheds. Rail access to the two sidings was via trailing
points, the one from the up line starting opposite the dock whilst the down
line's trailing point commenced some what south of the station. Between the two
was Tamworth South Signal Box.
The principal buildings of Tamworth 'High Level' station
were initially located on both platforms. Those on the up platform being
located to the north of the Trent Valley Railway whilst on the down platform
these were located to the south of the Trent Valley Railway. When the Trent
Valley Railway opened its principal station building, located on its down
(Stafford) line, it also provided booking office facilities for the Midland
Railway together with stairs and lift to 'High Level' station's up (Derby)
line. A sign clearly indicating the Midland Railway Booking Office can be seen
in images 'mrthl448a'. 'At a later date, early in
the 20th century, two additional lifts were installed, both on the 'High Level'
station's down platform, with one eitherside of the Trent Valley Railway.
Interconnecting steps from the High Level' platform to the 'Low Level' platform
were also provided on each side of the Trent Valley Railway. Immediately behind
the up platform buildings were two sidings as can be seen in image 'mrthl1835', the nearest one being the road which ran
to a locomotive turntable (as seen in any of the Ordnance Survey maps). When
this turntable was taken out of use is not certain but the use of the siding
for stabling wagons would seem to indicate that it was not in use by the late
1950s if not earlier. On the up platform was the water tank joined in 1924 by
an LMS Signal Box, both can be seen in image 'mrthl1836'.
Whilst Tamworth was only a small market town, its location
astride the West Coast Railway and the Midland Railway's Derby to Bristol main
lines gave it immense strategic importance as a postal exchange point. Mails
were first conveyed over the B&DJR in 1840, but it was several years later
that the Travelling Post Office (TPO) services became properly organised. In
the early days the Midland Railway's TPO ran from Rugby (via the former Midland
Counties route) to Newcastle and connections had to be made via the Rugby to
Birmingham line for the south west. In 1850, a Gloucester to Tamworth service
was established, followed by two years later a through Gloucester to Tamworth
to Newcastle working. The inauguration of a separate West Coast postal train,
in 1885, was a measure of the growth in traffic. Prior to this time, the postal
train had carried a limited number of passengers. In 1927, the down postal left
Euston at 8:30pm. It connected with the northbound Midland Railway TPO at
Tamworth about 10:40pm, whilst the up West Coast postal connected with the
southbound Midland TPO some hours later. Apart from these workings, there were
various railway and General Post Office (GPO) parcels exchanges, and the night
shift at Tamworth was often hard pressed to cope. When the new Tamworth
stations were opened on 24th September 1962, efficient parcels and mail
interchange facilities were a major factor in the design. The London North
Western Railway station was worked, in mechanical days, from two Signal Cabins,
No 1 and No 2 but with the introduction of Multiple Aspect Signalling (MAS)
signalling, this was reduced to one signal cabin (the former No 2). The Midland
Railway's 'High Level' station was also worked by two boxes for many years. The
north box was on the east side of the line beyond the platforms (near the
container wagons in the illustration). The south box was on the same side of
the line, but south of the LNWR overbridge. These cabins were subsequently
replaced by one central cabin on the Up platform, the signalling layout of
which is shown in in image 'mrthl1837'. This was,
in turn, replaced by Saltley power box in September 1969.
The Handbook of Railway Stations records that both the High
Level and Low Level stations had the full range of services available. These
are recorded as: Goods traffic; Passenger and Parcels traffic; Furniture Vans,
Carriages, Portable Engines, and Machines on Wheels; Live Stock; Horse boxes
and Prize Cattle Vans; Carriages by Passenger Trains (GPFLHC). Whereas the High
Level station's goods yard was equipped with a 5 ton crane (probably inside the
goods shed) the Low Level station's crane had double the lifting capacity being
rated at 10 tons. As an illustration of how close was the County of
Warwickshire's border can be assessed by the fact that whereas the High Level
and Low Level stations are listed in the Handbook as being in Staffordshire,
all of the private sidings listed under Tamworth were in Warwickshire. These
were: ME Jackson (Gibbs & Canning's Brick and Pipeworks); Kettlebrook; R
Lawrence (Glascote Colliery); R Patterson (Glascote Colliery Company's Amington
Colliery); Tamworth Colliery Company (Glascote Colliery Company's Amington
Colliery); Tamworth Colliery Company's Marshall's Siding; Tamworth Industrial
Cooperative Society (Alders Paper Mills Siding); and Thompson & Southwark's
Foundry (Kettlebrook).
In all probability, despite having separate goods yards, the
LNWR and MR shared their goods yards with each other. Bob Essery noted in his
caption to image 'lnwr_tam3642', a 1910
photograph showing a goods shed with both the LNWR & Midland Railway names
displayed at Tamworth, that the two companies also shared road transport
facilities. In this instance it was not just the traction engine but the
trailer too as both carried the two companies' names. Of interest is the fact
that the steam traction engine has the two names displayed as 'London North
Western & Midland Railways' whilst the trailer displays the two names
reversed, as 'Midland & London North Western Railways'. The difference
might reflect the principal ownership of the two items. If this practice was
followed through to the goods shed then its probably the High Level station's
goods shed that is seen. If you note the style of its canopy, it has sides with
curved valances, compared to images 'lnwr_tam3133' and 'lnwr_tam3644', you will note the latter images have
canopies with valances on the sides that are primarily horizontal and
diagonally straight. The only name visible is the LMS' as the photograph was
taken after grouping. However if our assumption is correct, that the ownership
of the shed can be derived by the first name, then it would be safe to assume
that the latter images are of the Low Level station's goods shed.
Much of the information on this and other pages of
Warwickshire Railways is derived from Volume One of LMS Stations by Preston
Hendry and Powell Hendry together with other articles or books listed in our
'bibliography'.
The Connections, actual and proposed, between the MR and
LNWR Tamworth Stations 1928
The following information was obtained courtesy of the
London North Western Railway Society and is from article published in the
Society's Journal Volume 8 No 3 December 2015.
The Tamworth Chord Lines
We start with a short piece written by member George Huxley
exposing the mystery surrounding lines around Tamworth. There then follows the
result of further work by Robin Mathams and Dave Barrett as part of their Trent
Valley Railway History Project. - LNWR Society Editor.
Tamworth East Curve - Notes and a Question by George
Huxley
The Tamworth west curve is well known: it ran from north to
west linking the Midland Railway with the LNWR Trent Valley line. The boundary
between the two companies was about half way along the curve. From the end-on
junction the London & North Western had running powers over the Midland to
Derby for all traffic with the use of stations other than the MR's goods
stations at Burton on Trent and Derby. The curve opened in 1847 and closed in
1969 [see John Cough, The Midland Railway: A Chronology (Mold 1989) pp2-5 and
209].
There was, however, also an east curve. This extended from a
position to the north of Tamworth Midland station close to the Stafford-Warwick
County Boundary to a junction with the Trent Valley line east of Tamworth LNWR
station. The curve was built under the Midland Railway (Branches etc) Act of
1866. Track was laid and was ready to open, but the junction at the Trent
Valley end was never completed [Cough, ibid p209J. An 'Ordnance Survey' survey
of 19(11 shows the curve intact but with the words 'Railway Dismantled'; the
survey is reproduced in Vic Mitchell and Keith Smith, Tamworth to Derby
(Midhurst 2015) Map III. The Midland Railway Distance Diagram for the Tamworth
District of 1921 (Sheet 26A) describes the curve as 'not laid'. I lad the
tracks been connected the Midland would have been, it may be supposed, the
owner as far as the Trent Vallev Junction, since the line was built under the
1866 Act giving powers to the MR. Cough states that the rails were removed
about 1878. Why was the connection never made?
The Tamworth Chord lines By Robin Mathams and Dave Barrett
The West Chord
The Trent Valley Railway (TVR) proposed a branch line from
Armitage to the Midland line at Alrewas to provide a better route from the
North-west to the East Midlands, but the Alrewas Branch was excluded from the
TVR's Parliamentary Bill, which may have been the reason the Tamworth west
chord was built - as an alternative. However, as yet, no evidence has been
found to support this and there is certainly no clue from the TVR Co Board
minutes and other documents. There were later efforts to get parliamentary
approval for the branch including the raising of finance, but these all came to
naught and the reason why has not yet been found.
In May 1846, the London & Birmingham's Trent Committee
(TC) - the L&B had by now bought the TVR - considered the draft agreement
with the Midland Railway for the west chord, the arrangements being recommended
for acceptance by Thomas Gooch, TVR chief engineer. The TC transferred to the
LNWR on its formation and continued to manage the building of the Railway.
On 3rd June 1847 a Trent Sub-Committee appointed to
negotiate with the Midland Railway regarding the west curve recommended: 'That
additional purchase of land at Tamworth be approved - and that every possible
dispatch be used in completing the junction', and a week later, on Thursday
10th June, the TC minuted Mr Gooch's report: The junction line at Tamworth will
be completed on Saturday evening next [12th June], and I have written to Mr
Barlow [Chief Engineer of the Midland Railway] to put in the points at once to
connect with the Midland line'. Mr Gooch's stated urgency was well justified
because the TVR planned opening was set for June, then delayed until September
because of the compound-girder bridge strengthening, although the opening
ceremony went ahead at Tamworth as planned on June 26th.
Also, on 10th June the LNWR Goods Agent reported: 'At
Tamworth, I consider that there will be needed plenty of siding and
accommodation for loading and trains to and from the Midland Railway as there
will be considerable weight in trains that now pass via Birmingham to Derby,
Leicester and Nottingham...will have to pass over the incline junction that is
being made by your company, and without sidings to dispose of such trains there
would be much inconvenience.' This evidence indicates that, because
considerable goods traffic to/from the North-west would be diverted over the
steeply-inclined chord, LNWR sidings would be required for loading, and
marshalling smaller trains to enable locomotives to cope. The chord was single
track about 10 chains (220 yards) in length.
In 1849 the LNWR gained an additional link to the Midland
via the chord line at Lichfield to the South Staffs line; the link is still in
use today.
The East Chord
As George Huxley outlines, it is somewhat shrouded in
mystery and we agree. Of the chord, George states it was built under the
Midland Railway (Branches) Act of 1866 which suggests it was a Midland Railway
proposal rather than one of the LNWR. The earthworks for the potential junction
with the Trent Line at 109m 35ch at Bole Hall appear on the LNWR 1880 asset
survey and George quotes John Cough who states the rails were removed in 1878,
which is why the OS map of 1901 has the curve marked as 'dismantled'. The 1880
LNWR survey shows a signal box in existence for the junction on the Down side
of the main line - it is marked 'unused' - and the Down line junction signal is
also shown and these two pieces of evidence appear to verify work on the
connection was well advanced, but then halted for some reason. The 1901 OS map
shows no signal box at the potential junction, which indicates demolition by
then. The chord would have been around 50 chains (1/2 mile +) long and the
earthworks suggest it was double-track and the parts of the embankment which
survive are marked on today's OS maps.
What was its purpose and why was it never connected? The
only plausible reason seems to be to provide an alternative route from the
Midland line to/from the south which avoided Coventry and Birmingham, there
being a route from Burton to Nuneaton, and as it was built under a Midland
Railway Act as outlined earlier, it suggests it was a Midland proposal - or was
it the LNWR's and the Midland offered to get the Parliamentary approval using
its 1866 Act? As the presence of the unused signal-box and junction signals on
the LNWR Trent line indicate the line was to be connected, did the LNWR then
review its business case and decide against it? Or did the Midland do the same?
Or was there a falling-out between the LNWR and the Midland? Whatever, the
portion of the line as built appears to have had a very short life of probably
less than 12 years. The hunt for further evidence goes on...
1928 Aerial Views of Tamworth Station and adjacent
sidings
Locomotives seen at or near Tamworth High Level
station
Ordnance Survey Maps and schematic diagrams of both the Low
and High Level stations
Accident Report by JLA Simmons, Captain Royal Engineers,
Inspector of Railways.
Derby to Tamworth 11th February 1848
An accident by collision which occurred on the Birmingham
and Derby section of the Midland Railway. It appears that a goods-train left
Derby on the 11th February at 7:15 am for Birmingham, that it stopped at Burton
to pick up and leave waggons (sic), at Oakley to take water for the supply of
the engine, which latter station it left at 8:40 am, being 20 minutes before
the proper time for the arrival of the passenger-train, which leaves Derby for
Birmingham at 8:15. The distance which it had to travel before arriving at the
next place, Tamworth, where it could be got out of the way to allow the
passenger-train to pass, was 6¼ miles. The passenger-train departed from
Oakley at 9:01 am, being about 1 minute behind time. It was drawn by two
engines, and according to its usual working would arrive at Tamworth about
9:12, 3 minutes before the time advertised for its departure, allowing
sufficient time to fill the engine-tender with water.
When about half-a-mile on the Derby side of the station,
the guard descended from the goods train with a signal, in order to stop any
coming train, whilst the goods were being shunted, to allow the passenger-train
to pass. He was no sooner on the ground than he heard the other train
approaching: it was quite close, and immediately passed him and ran into the
goods-train about 100 yards from him. The morning was very foggy, and the
drivers of the passenger-train could not see him until quite close upon him.
They used their utmost endeavours to stop, but without avail, not having
sufficient space. The passenger-train, when its drivers first saw the signal of
the goods-guard, were travelling at about 40 or 45 miles per hour, and the
goods-train at 15 or 16 miles per hour. None of the passengers were injured. It
appears that the proper time for the goods-train to have left Derby was 2:00
am; it was consequently 5 hours 15 minutes behind time, the reason assigned for
which was, that there was no engine available to take the train away from
Derby, the company not having sufficient locomotive power to supply with
punctuality the wants of their traffic.
The cause of this was stated to be the rapid increase of
the traffic upon this railway, an idea of which may be formed from the fact
that the merchandize (sic) carried in November 1847, exceeded by 20,445 tons
the amount carried in November 1846. The Company are now, however, increasing
their locomotive stock, several new engines having been delivered from the
builders in the course of the present month. It appears also that the driver
and guard of the passenger-train were ignorant that a train was in front of
them, and therefore had not the advantage of this knowledge to make them drive
with caution, and it further appeared in the course of the inquiry, that the
guards, although supplied by the Company with watches, do not keep a register
of the time of arrival at and departure from every station, but only note the
time at the terminal stations. The time-tables supplied to the drivers and
Company's servants are very perfect, showing the proper time of the train at
every station, whether it stops thereat (sic) or not, and I conceive it would
tend much to the safety of the public if the guards were directed to register
the actual time of passing each station: it would have the effect of keeping
them on the look-out; it would act as a check upon the drivers, and would
facilitate inquiries into accidents, and tend to the discovery of those who are
to blame whenever they may occur. I also conceive that it would conduce to
safety in the working of lines if every engine-driver were made acquainted
before commencing a journey with the nature of the train which preceded him,
and its hour of departure.
Although fortunately no serious injury occurred to
individuals from this collision, and none of the Company's servants have been
guilty of a dereliction of duty, I must beg to call to the especial notice of
the Commissioners the fact that the collision was caused by a want of
punctuality in the working of the goods-train, the times for which are stated
in the time-table in the same manner as for passenger-trains. Any deviation
from a time-table is a source of danger, and it is essential to safety in the
working of every railway that all the trains, both for the conveyance of goods,
minerals, or passengers should be worked with the utmost regularity.
|